Dean's World

Defending the liberal tradition in history, science, and philosophy.

Prussian Blue: Just Another Entertainment Industry Tradition

Much is being made in some circles about a singing duo named Prussian Blue, who are apparently soft and gushy on Nazism. I haven't paid it much attention mostly because I don't listen to much pop music. I prefer blues and rock, and when I listen to pop it's usually old-school stuff that's stood the test of time. My general rule is that if people are still listening to something ten years after it was released, it's probably worth checking out. Some pop music fits into that category, 98% does not.

But now there's apparently a significant kerfuffle over two 13-year-old singers who are gushy about Nazism, and I find myself strangely unable to get excited about it. Not because I have anything nice to say about Nazism, but because I've been watching the entertainment industry speak endearingly of vile totalitarian ideologies for most of my life.

This is the same entertainment industry that lionizes Che Guevara and Fidel Castro. The same industry that made heroes out of the mass-murdering Sandinistas. That to this day pretends that the McCarthy era in America was nothing but one long paranoid nightmare wherein nobody, not even people like Alger Hiss, Julius Rosenberg, or Harry Dexter White, was guilty of anything but being a bit too liberal.

Some of these people still can't admit that Pete Seeger, Paul Robeson, and Mary Travers were communists for God's sake.

A couple of years ago I was in a Denny's when I spotted a kid wearing a bright blood-red shirt with a big yellow hammer and sickle. I wanted to walk over to him and slap him in the face. But instead I shrugged. He was 21 or 22 at the oldest, maybe more like 18 or 19. He couldn't possibly have known the depths of the evil his shirt represented. The Soviets, when they invaded Afghanistan, murdered a million innocent Afghans. This out of a country of only 6 or 7 million people. That was going on as recently as the 1980s. You think those Afghans today would find Nazi chic more offensive than Communist chic?

I also, a year or two before that, got into an argument with a friend in his early 20s who actually thought I was "melodramatic" when I pointed out that Stalin had killed, by the most conservative estimates available, about 20 million people in cold blood. (Others place his body count over 60 million.) Yet you can go around the world and find restaurants, drinks, and music that extols the virtues of him and communist dictators just like him.

It's all sick of course. Depraved even. If I were Jewish I'd be particularly stung by "Prussian Blue." If I were Ukranian or Chinese or Vietnamese or Cambodian or Afghan, on the other hand, maybe it would all seem just sadly familiar. Hitler not so bad? Why not? Next up: pop songs about the glories of the Laogai!

By all means, let's kick around "Prussian Blue." Let's especially kick around their parents and their producers. These 13 year old twits likely have no idea what they're talking about, but the adults in their lives have no such excuse. But while we're doing it, let's remember all the other cases of covering up for, even romanticizing, hateful totalitarian ideologies. I think we'd be doing more good in the long run that way.

Posted by Dean | Permalink | Technorati Trackbacks
Gaijin Biker (mail) (www):
He was 21 or 22 at the oldest, maybe more like 18 or 19. He couldn't possibly have known the depths of the evil his shirt represented.
Couldn't he have opened his history books once or twice while he was in high school?
11.28.2005 2:13am
Gaijin Biker (mail) (www):
(Just to be clear, I'm criticizing the kid, not you, Dean.)
11.28.2005 2:14am
Phelps (www):
GB, do you actually think that the history books might have any condemnation in them? I was in HS in the early 90s, and I didn't see any. (And I actually read the history books.) Communism was presented as simply a "different economic theory", not the mass murder plot it really was.
11.28.2005 11:45am
Harkonnenmutt (mail) (www):
Communism was/is often presented as the ideal system we humans were too greedy to use. If only we could change. To this day liberals hold to ideas that require human nature to change.
11.28.2005 3:12pm
David Gillies (mail) (www):
The Commies are given a free pass by fools such as the kid you mention because of their supposedly altruistic beliefs. "Yes," say the idiot fellow travellers, "bad things happened under Communism, but they were trying to make the world a better place." It's what Arnold Kling calls an M-type argument vs. a C-type argument. Lefties and their ilk argue from motivation, more hard-headed rationalists like me argue from consequences. If an ideology, no matter how purportedly clean in its motives, ends up wiping out a hundred million people then it must be confronted, opposed and destroyed (q.v. Environmentalism, radical; malaria; DDT).

Note I'm not willing to cede the idea that Communism is noble but flawed—I just state that that is the reason why so many do not execrate it in the same manner as they do Naziism and fascism. On the contrary: I believe it is a vile and baleful creed, and its practitioners, for all their cant about wishing to create a Utopia, would wade through and ocean of blood to get there with nary a thought.
11.29.2005 9:52am