Dean's World

Defending the liberal tradition in history, science, and philosophy.

Pajamas Media

There's a new blogger syndication and promotion service starting up called Pajamas Media. To my mild surprise, some well-known bloggers, including Madison's own always-excellent Ann Althouse and the incomparable Ace of Spades are rather down on it. Their reasoning appears to boil down to this: you have to give up other ad revenues and accept a flat monthly rate from the Pajamaguys, and they feel that bloggers could do better financially persuing their own ads.

I won't quarrel with that, although I'm a bit surprised at the vehemence. The vast majority of bloggers I know--and I'm certainly one of them--started this with no intention of making money. Most of us do it as a labor of love, and if someone drops a quarter in the tip jar (it's over there on the left hint hint) or buys an ad, that's a bonus.

Although Dean's World has seen consistent and steady growth over the last three and a half years, and has wildly more readers than I ever imagined, the truth is that I don't enjoy thinking about advertisers. I don't want to be blogging thinking about whether or not what I'm writing will drive traffic up or down. I don't want to think about whether it will attract advertisers or not. What success I've found, I've found through adhering to a pretty simple rule:

I write about whatever I want, whenever I want, for whatever reason I want. Anyone else is just along for the ride.

So whenever I find myself thinking, "how can I get more ad money?" or "I got $X in ads last month but only $Y this month, why?" my stress levels go up and I stop having fun.

With these guys, I can stop thinking about advertisers almost completely (unless some ad goes up that I strenuously object to anyway). Pajamas Media will bring in a predictable (if small) amount of income to make it worthwhile, and will also promote your blog and increase its respectability and visibility in the "real media" world. Sounds like a win all the way around to me: I signed up immediately.

I will say that, unlike a few bloggers I've known, I've never seen blogging as a business. Never. I see it as more of a promotional vehicle for if and when I choose to write professionally (by the way, anyone know a good literary agent?). If you're running a business then having a blog can be a great way to promote it. But blogging as a business unto itself? I see that working for very few people. So, a hassle-free, tech support free, steady advertiser to help supplement the income a little, that'll also help promote the blog, and that I can otherwise ignore? Seems like a winner to me.

I just don't want to be in the ad-hustling business. I don't even want to think about the subject. I just want to write. That's why I dig the Pajamas Media approach.

Posted by Dean | Permalink | Technorati Trackbacks
Tim Worstall (www):
All good reasons Dean. My situation is Ithink a little differentin that the PM offer means a substantial reduction in earnings (no, not from current, but from what I think is coming from some new initiatives). I also want to see moreaboutwhat they’redoing with hte syndication thing.
8.1.2005 10:34am
Michael Demmons (mail) (www):
I'm going to stick with BlogAds. I don't do this for the money. If I did, I'd have killed myself by now. I put BlogAds on my site probably for the same reason you do Dean, because if someone wants to give me money, fine. But if they don't, who cares.
8.1.2005 10:56am
Scott Kirwin (mail) (www):
I buy Blogads but they've ignored my emails asking to get them on my sites. It would be nice if they at least answered them with polite rejections.

There needs to be competition in any market. Currently Blogads is the only game in town, and that's trouble for those of us who buy them or list them.

Ditto Paypal. If anything needed competition it's the online payment system. I can't even transfer money between my own accounts without them taking a cut.
8.1.2005 12:09pm
Eric R. Ashley (mail) (www):
I'm just wondering when and if PM is going to kick into gear. Of course as a Slithering Reptile, I'm way out in the long tail of the Blogobeast so information may take a while to get from the dino's brain to its tail.
8.1.2005 1:03pm
Steven Malcolm Anderson (www):
They'd better not put up any ugly ads. I hate ugly ads. They make me puke.

The ads I like are those ads for Conservative T-Shirts showing sexy women wearing T-shirts with Right-Wing slogans like "Hippies Smell", "Commies Aren't Cool", and "Peace Through Superior Firepower".
8.1.2005 1:15pm
Ian S. (mail) (www):
So if you don't want to be in the ad-hustling business, why run ads at all? As far as I can tell, there are two reasons to run ads: either you want the crazy blog money like Ace, or you have the crazy bandwidth charges. I can respect the former, especially if you're up front about it, but for the latter cheap/free hosting has never been better.

Personally PJ strikes me as a good idea (obviously there's room for a BlogAds competitor with wider aspirations) but the jury's still out on the actual execution. Charles publically calling out critics of the concept doesn't inspire confidence though.
8.1.2005 9:52pm
Jay Currie (mail) (www):
No question that Blogads could improve...as could Google Adsense. A really clever Yahoo rollout could make a huge difference.

The PJ media idea of a flat rate for "x" adspace makes a lot of sense for a certain sort of blog. And as most of you will have read, Anne Althouse has lots to say about what sort.

In the short run it seems like a good offer. But my bet is that the blog world is only going to get bigger and, in fact, blogs will fairly quickly replace static websites. (Which will still be around for brochere ware.)

All that said, the critical mass in blogging is not there yet. Partially because the vast majority of our readers are way behind bloggers in terms of their tech savvy. While bloggers are sucking down two hundred feeds a day, the average surfer has no idea what a personal aggregator is. Which is why I am building a web based aggregation platform. (Plug...so shoot me.)

Until people can access blogs easily the idea of actually making a living blogging is some distance away. Coming, but not there yet.
8.1.2005 11:14pm
Dean Esmay:
Ian: The question seems kind of strange to me. I run ads because the money is useful. That doesn't mean that I want my top priority to be maximizing ad revenue. It simply isn't. I've even had numerous people urge me to raise my rates because they think I'm worth it, and I resist, in large part because I don't want to be constantly thinking about what the ideal revenue-maximizing amount is. I just don't want to deal with it.

Jay: Yeah, Anne's gone on and on about what kind of blogger would accept the deal, much of it inaccurate. For example, Dean's World has a good bit more traffic than her site does (no brag, just fact) and has been gaining readership fairly steadily for three years. We continue to grow month after month. Yet the infrastructure the PJ guys provide strikes me as far more attractive than hustling my own ads. Anne seems to find that inconceivable or stupid. Me? I think it's a smart move. I prefer the infrastructure Pajamas Media provides over the theoretically better money I could make hustling for Blogads. I don't diss people who go the other way, but why diss me?
8.2.2005 12:06am
Solomon (mail) (www):
I'll be signing up with PJ. I've never bothered with ads (figured I couldn't get enough to be worth even the hit to my page layout), but I've been reconsidering of late and only just a very short time ago bothered putting up the Amazon and PayPal tip jars -- didn't want the pressure, didn't want to be beholden to anyone.

I feel like I'm investing in PJ and I'd like to give it a ride for awhile. I'm also really interested in their aggregation stuff and I'm hoping that actually leads to something. That attracts me as much, if not more, than the ad money.

I had a few questions which were answered promptly and to my satisfaction.

I don't think Charles called anyone out. He responded to concerns, rather politely I thought.
8.2.2005 12:25am
Solomon (mail) (www):
BTW, Do I worry that one of the other services that are "right around the corner" may be better monatarily? Yes, I guess I do, but I figure it's like buying computer hardware -- you've got to stop waiting one more week and just buy in at some point. If there's a lot better deal that comes along, then PJ will just have to adjust their fee structure accordingly to compete, and likely share with their current partners (if the ad money is really rolling in) to keep everyone happy and on-board when it comes time to renew.
8.2.2005 12:30am