Dean's World

Defending the liberal tradition in history, science, and philosophy.

Galactica News

Well look at this. Quote:

The July 15 "SCI FI Fridays" season premieres of the SCI FI Channel original series Battlestar Galactica, Stargate SG-1 and Stargate Atlantis led the network to the top ratings of the night on basic cable among adults 18-49 and 25-54, the channel announced.

The second-season premiere of Galactica was the number-one program on television, including broadcast and cable, among men aged 25-54 and 18-49.

I find myself wondering if this will turn out to be the first dramatic series to start on cable to get picked up by a major broadcast network.

Posted by Dean | Permalink | Technorati Trackbacks
cardeblu (mail):
I find myself wondering if this will turn out to be the first dramatic series to start on cable to get picked up by a major broadcast network.

God, I hope not. IMO, that would ruin any or all 3 of them (BG, SG1, SGA). I like them right where they are, on that channel, and in those time slots. They are about the only shows we watch on any regular basis. We have DirecTV, so each are shown twice.

If only the Sci-Fi Channel had picked up "Enterprise"...
7.31.2005 2:51am
cardeblu (mail):
Oh, and I wonder why the 2 different age groups when they overlap each other? Except for the men one for BG, I fall into both (18-49 and 25-54).
7.31.2005 2:58am
Dean Esmay:
I'm guessing one is Nielson and another is some other company. I don't know who else does ratings but I'm pretty sure Nielson isn't the only one.
7.31.2005 3:06am
John Eddy (mail) (www):
I'm with Cardeblu- having one of the networks pick up this show would be the death of it, pure and simple. They'd want to put it on at 8:00 to catch the kiddies then theyd get all worried about the "tough" themes dealt with and next thing you know they arrive at the Casino Planet.

Screw that.
7.31.2005 3:50am
Dean Esmay:
The networks are doing more and more innovative programming all the time. Television shows these days are smarter, better made, better written, and with better acting than most of what was on 20 or 30 years ago, and there's a reason: it turns out audiences actually do like quality. (They also still like stupid stuff of course. Nothing can please everybody.)

It's clear from listening and reading the stuff from the creative staff on Galactica that they would never ink a deal where they had to change the show to satisfy the network. Furthermore, there's no reason for the big networks to be looking to pick up Galactica if they didn't see its potential. Why buy an existing show when you could just rip off its ideas and add whatever stupid things you thought would make it more appealing to kids?

They've picked up the Galactica miniseries and so far there's no evidence they plan to change it significantly (although I'll bet I know one scene they remove). But if that miniseries does well, then Moore et. al. will be in the cat bird seat: they've got a show that's successful where it's at, and have kept complete creative control doing it, and can stay where they're at and be assured of at least a couple more years of success. Thereofore, if a major network wants them, it's going to have to either offer a ridiculous (and frankly unjustifiable) amount of money, or, they're going to have to ink a deal that says Moore et. al. keep complete creative control and that the network honchos keep their hands off.

Such arrangements were once unheard of for the networks but now they are quite common. A number of production companies now have deals like that.
7.31.2005 5:15am
Jerry Kindall (www):
It's not like Sci-Fi didn't want changes anyway. They insisted on a change to the theme music (the original opening music, which was used in the UK, wasn't martial enough for them). Although it appears that Moore has got his way on that for the new series.
7.31.2005 6:21am
Andrew Ian Dodge (mail) (www):
Stargate Altlantic...shudder.
7.31.2005 11:23am
TallDave (mail) (www):
Nice to see Sci-Fi doing well.

I've thought both the Stargate series were pretty well-done. They're one of maybe a half-dozen shows on TV I deem watchable.
7.31.2005 1:55pm
jody (mail) (www):
"I find myself wondering if this will turn out to be the first dramatic series to start on cable to get picked up by a major broadcast network."

Monk went from USA to ABC.
7.31.2005 10:21pm
Dean Esmay:
I didn't know that. Thought Monk was still on USA. That's cool.
7.31.2005 11:03pm
jody (mail) (www):
You're right. Monk is still on USA. But after a successful season on USA, ABC started showing the reruns of Monk...
7.31.2005 11:41pm
Dan Champion (mail) (www):
I hope that Galactica doesn't get TOO popular, or the Sci Fi Channel might go all Farscape on them. I still mourn the loss of that clever, innovative show.
8.1.2005 12:15am
Jerry Kindall (www):
There have been other series to go from cable to broadcast TV. I can't think of one right now, though.
8.1.2005 4:31am
Andrew Ian Dodge (mail) (www):
Well quite a few cartoons get made for Cartoon Network and if they really do well get picked up by terrestrial channels.
8.1.2005 7:01am
Dean Esmay:
Jerry: Bill Maher's show did it. This is why I specified dramatic series and not just "show."
8.1.2005 8:23am
Phelps (www):
Stargate SG-1 is shown in syndication on broadcast here. It started on Showtime and then broadcast syndication -- and then moved the first run to Sci-Fi.
8.1.2005 2:07pm
Dean Esmay:
Local stations control their own programming, and when you see a show in syndication on a local affiliate it's almost certainly *not* something the network picked up, but rather, something the local affiliate decided to carry. It generally has nothing to do with the networks.
8.1.2005 7:37pm