Apologies
Dean
I was being silly in my previous post on the moral roots of Islam, and a few of you didn't understand that I was just teasing you. So let me make this clearer:
You can argue with me all you want over whether Islam is inherently violent, inherently dangerous, inherently oppressive, etc. But why? If you really have questions, if you really seek the truth, why not go talk to an actual muslim? One who's actually studied his faith deeply and who is willing to engage in both apologetics* and open dialogue?
Why talk about me and what I say? If you think this guy's a liar and a fool, and I'm a fool to listen to him, why not enter into discussion with him? What, are you afraid he'll bite you?
(* "Apologetics" is not a bad word. See this definition.)
Related Posts (on one page):
No, blow me up....
Sorry, sorry... couldn't resist.
You ask why discuss with you and not with him, right? I have a simple explanation. We like discussing things with you. It's why we come here.
Yours,
Wince, aka Tom Hawkson
Which is why I find it amusing that some people say it's not a real apology if you try to defend or explain your actions in any way. Actually, it's not a real apology unless you try to defend or explain your actions in some way.
So from now on I'll just say "I'm sorry".
Yours,
Wince, aka Tom Hawkson