The Big Question in Star Formation
Dean
A certain class of star radiates so much that it's thought to make it impossible for matter to fall into it. Yet the stars grow more massive over time anyway. Astronomers are struggling to figure out why.
Defending the liberal tradition in history, science, and philosophy.
A certain class of star radiates so much that it's thought to make it impossible for matter to fall into it. Yet the stars grow more massive over time anyway. Astronomers are struggling to figure out why.
Arnold Harris
Mount Horeb WI
There just ins't enough mass (gravity) in the galaxies to counteract their centrifical force. So they make up the difference for the unknown X and give it the name dark matter, and/or dark energy.
That is not to say that I don't think dark matter exists, just that no one really knows what is going on.
My own suspicion is that, like the ether, dark matter and dark energy simply don't exist--and that the real problem is that Einstein was wrong on some very fundamental level that's led everyone off in the wrong direction. (Note that I did not say he was stupid, nor that I have even a vague idea what the problem is. I merely note, looking in from the outside, that that's what it looks like.)
Someone will eventually come along and figure it out. We may not live to see it, but....
I think dark matter and dark energy almost certainly do exist. A gravitating vacuum is not ruled out by any current theory. Special relativity is among the most rigorously tested and confirmed theories we have. General relativity is very robust. We do know that it breaks down at very high energies (i.e. very small length scales), but for most cosmological phenomena it's amazingly well-confirmed. If it is eventually overturned, it will be in the way that relativity overturned Newtonian mechanics: by incorporating it as a boundary case of the wider theory.