Dean's World

Defending the liberal tradition in history, science, and philosophy.

Plame Horse Almost, But Not Entirely, Completely Dead

I'm not sure what I'll remember as the dumbest story of the 2004 election season. I guess it's a tie whether it was the phoney story that we'd see a return of a military draft, or the Valerie Plame "outed spy" nonsense.

I guess I'll pick the Valerie Plame baloney, only because the phoney "they're bringing back the draft" story was serious enough that Congress actually voted on it (nearly universally against, mind you--only two members actually voted for it). The Plame nonsense, however, has dragged on and on and on and on--even long after it was pretty obvious that the only person who'd "outed" the "undercover agent" Valerie Plame was her husband Joe Wilson.

The mainstream press here in America had done their best to whip this phoney "scandal" into national news for well over a year--until prosecutors started threatening to force reporters to divulge their sources. Then all of a sudden the press started screaming that this whole story was a witch hunt. It reached the height of absurdity last Thursday, though, with major news organizations arguing that there was no proof a crime had actually been committed here, and demanding proof that a law was actually broken before harassing reporters any further.

Can you get more rich with irony? Apparently people in the press are all too happy to pass along half-assed allegations that smear people in government.... until one of their own is in the crosshairs. THEN they start asking whether there's any actual proof that a crime was committed?

Ah. You gotta love the press corps.

(Via Mark Noonan.)

Posted by Dean | Permalink | Technorati Trackbacks
Sigivald (mail):
Even funnier, it's not just that "the media" was reporting it and then "the media" backed off and demanded proof.

What's funny is that the Times, specifically, did that. One institution. It would be unremarkable if, say, the Post had been pushing the story, and, say, the Sun Times had decided to ask for proof; that's just "the media" working decently as it should, covering multiple views of one story.

But when it's the Times (and other papers) contradicting themselves now that it's got no chance of hurting a certain President, well, that's just comedy.
3.28.2005 3:45pm
Bryan AWS (mail) (www):
One wishes one could call up all the archives of Daily Kos, Atrios, and the like and find all the vile depictions of Bob Novak and laugh, laugh, laugh.
3.28.2005 5:18pm
Rhianna (aka rmschoon) (mail) (www):
Ugh, Bryan I'm not sure I'd have the stomach to wade through the crapulence over at DK, Atrios and their ilk. At any rate, I'd seriously need a disinfection and shower afterwards!

Now Dean, do we haffta? You never know where those press corps folks have been, so the though of 'loving' them is pretty repulsive to me. ;)
3.29.2005 10:17am