Dean's World

Defending the liberal tradition in history, science, and philosophy.

Kayak of the Living Dead

Night of the Living Dead. Dawn of the Dead. House of the Dead. Resident Evil. 28 Days Later. Shaun of the Dead and my favorite, Night of the Comet.

If you found yourself in a zombie worst-case scenario, surrounded by brain-munching neighbors, would you survive or would you be zombie chow? Take the test.

I’d survive, but just barely (Dad never taught me how to shoot an Uzi). Unfortunately, the test didn’t ask the right question. I mean, when you’re in an urban place like London or New York, wouldn’t you head to the harbor and steal a boat? If zombies can’t run, they can’t swim - they definitely couldn’t figure out how to start one of those annoying outboard motors.

Now that I think about it, neither can I. I guess you could grab a rowboat or a kayak..

..which wouldn’t be a great moment in zombie movie cinematography. Which is probably why they never do that.

Nevermind.

[Link thanks to Michele, who takes a ‘when in Rome..’ attitude towards a zombie attack]

Posted by Mary Madigan | Permalink | Technorati Trackbacks
Scott Kirwin (mail) (www):
The key to any zombie attack is to balance increased firepower with zombie levels. You want the maximum firepower with the minimum number of zombies around.

Unfortunately in suburbia there are few gun stores but lots of people, which means that the exurbs and rural areas are your best bet (these have fewer people/potential zombies but larger numbers of firearms stores).

72% Zombie Survivor Woohoo!
3.16.2005 12:10pm
CVD (mail):
83% Armed and Dangerous. Scott, you have a good point. Some options I would take were not listed, but oh well. I also think it would depend on what kind of Zombies you have to deal with. If I had the 28 Day Later type I think I would just try to find somewhere and hole up until they all starved of froze to death. That strategy wouldn't do well against the Night of The Living Dead type.
3.16.2005 12:22pm
Scott Kirwin (mail) (www):
CVD
Excellent point. So I guess another key would be to discern as early as possible which type of zombie you are up against and act accordingly.
3.16.2005 1:18pm
Deanna Barr (mail):
Hah! 99% survival. Good thing I know how to use a shotgun and am a good shot...
3.16.2005 2:00pm
Dave Schuler (mail) (www):
The test is prejudiced in favor of relatively-ineffective weapons against the presumed targets. As it works out I am highly skilled with staff and edged weapons (and own such things). Not to mention the naginata which is a fine weapon against such critters. And they never run out of ammo.
3.16.2005 2:33pm
Dave Schuler (mail) (www):
Oh, and I scored 59% even under the circumstances.
3.16.2005 2:33pm
Drew Vogel (mail) (www):
Ack! Pet Peeve # 37,494: It's Shaun, not Sean, of the Dead. Sorry, but I have this thing about accuracy in titles.
3.16.2005 2:34pm
Chris Lansdown (mail) (www):
Dave,

Is the naganata one of those horse-beheading weapons? The name sounds familiar, but I can't place it.
3.16.2005 3:38pm
Sigivald (mail):
A naginata can't kill a zombie at 100 yards, but a rifle can.

And the key is to not have to go find a gun store and arm up after the zombies appear; the key is to already have some guns.

With prices as low as they are now, there's just no excuse for not having a shotgun, rifle, or at very least a pistol for anti-zombie work.

(Given prices, the cheap option is the rifle, probably an M-44 Mosin-Nagant. As a bonus, it has a permanently attached bayonet, which will at least hold the thing still for a minute while you reload, say.

I'm certain a 7.62x54R round will quite comfortably explode a zombie's skull at 200 yards, minimum.)
3.16.2005 3:46pm
Dave Schuler (mail) (www):
A naginata is a Japanese halberd. They're a blade mounted on a shaft about nine feet long.
3.16.2005 3:56pm
CVD (mail):
9 feet vs 100 yards, I'll take 100 yards.
3.16.2005 4:03pm
maryatexitzero (mail):
It's Shaun, not Sean, of the Dead.

Thanks, it's fixed.

I don't know how to shoot an Uzi, but we do have a collection of Lord of the Rings trinkets in the house. I guess a Narsil sword could come in handy..
3.16.2005 4:18pm
triticale (mail) (www):
If I cared to take it again, it would be interesting to see if my mere 59% was a result of caring about others rather than going it alone. My .308 Mauser and the wee wifey's 32 revolver are not optimum zombie-killers, but they would surely get us the three blocks to collect our son's 20 gauge, and with that I'm sure we could get to where we could rearm.
3.16.2005 6:33pm
Rhianna (aka rmschoon) (mail) (www):
SWEET! I like that test. I scored
Armed and Dangerous with 88%

Uzi schmoozy. I want NO bladed weapons, risk of cutting yourself in close-combat situtations. Better to kill 'em long before they get to you.

On the armament front, I think I've got an advantage. USAF base is 10 miles from here, and if WE ain't got enough guns, we've got some very heavily fortified buildings to use as a base to get guns...None of that damn baseball bat and machette crap from 28 Days Later. Give me Milla with a shotgun any day! (Sorry Brits, you'll have to fend for yourself, this Texan is in it for her own self and family.)
3.16.2005 6:42pm
Kevin D:
82% here. Go me. IMHO, if you need to rely on blades, you're one inch away from hosed. You gotta take zombies out at range. And I wouldn't be too excited about being 10 miles froma USAF base, Rhianna. You're running a higher chance than the rest of us of encountering radiation/virual zombies depending on what kind of base it is. No fun running headlong into zombie ground zero.
3.17.2005 1:22am
Casey Tompkins (mail) (www):
I've always had a crush on Catherine Mary Stewart.

Favorite quote: Daddy would have gotten us Uzis..." Heh.
3.17.2005 1:55am
Christiana E. (mail) (www):
Regarding the USAF base, that's a dangerous risk. Think about all the zombie movies you've ever seen, despite seeming initially like a good idea, relying on the military almost never works out in the end. Not for either kind of zombie. (See Day of the Dead and 28 Days Later) Shaun just got lucky.
3.17.2005 7:38am
CVD (mail):
Dean's World needs more Zombie discussions! Woo Hoo!
3.17.2005 12:23pm
Scott Kirwin (mail) (www):
Dave
The naginata is a formidable weapon, especially when employed against mounted samurai - but learning to use it without hurting onesself would present quite a challenge, especially if one found himself suddenly.

The good thing about firearms is that the learning curve is quite steep, if only to use them adequately.

True mastery takes time like anything else, but I'm sure that even my mother could pick up a MAC-10 and fire it relatively accurately. I am positive her accuracy would improve greatly if she happened to be shooting at my sister's ex-husband - whether zombified or not.
3.17.2005 2:17pm
Rhianna (aka rmschoon) (mail) (www):
Hehehe, Kevin according to a resident nutcase here in the UK we've got a "flip-up runway" to land the "Aurora Aircraft" on. I am not shitting you! (We've got an old WWII runway that's now the main road on our base.)

We do however have very heavily armed communications and some State Department folks, plus the firing range. Also, figure in our base is a GSU (geographically seperated unit) in a very rural area of the country, and I know almost all the backroads in the area so getting from here to there but avoiding the local population would be very easy for me.

Oooh, and there is the rumor we've got an Al Quida gun runner living in one of the stately mansions near by too. (Rumor only folks, rumor only!)

I'm not saying stay there. I'm saying as a ammo depo you can't get much better in a country that's afraid of guns and bladed weapons (under 16's can NOT buy a butter knife without an adult present, COME ON!). Plus, MRE heaven here we come...puts the can goods to shame. Well, not without driving 6 hours to the most secure USA base I've seen in this country...image roof-mounted machine guns on Hummers pointed at the British and you'll get a slight taste...The Army can always be counted on to arm themselves properly! ;)
3.17.2005 3:45pm
Dean Esmay (www):
Man. This has to be the best discussion thread ever!
3.17.2005 6:04pm