Dean's World

Defending the liberal tradition in history, science, and philosophy.

Saddam's Half-Brother Captured

A new trophy (and possible rich source of info on the insurgency) is now in the hands of the Iraqi government: Sadaam Hussein's half-brother.

And they way they got him is no coincidence:

CAIRO, Egypt - Iraqi officials said Sunday that Syrian authorities had captured Saddam Hussein's half-brother and 29 other officials of the deposed dictator's Baath Party in Syria and handed them over to Iraq in an apparent goodwill gesture.

Sabawi Ibrahim al-Hassan, a former Saddam adviser suspected of financing insurgents after U.S. troops ousted Saddam, was captured in Hasakah in northeastern Syria near the Iraqi border, two senior Iraqi officials told The Associated Press by telephone on condition of anonymity. Hasakah is about 30 miles from the Iraqi border.

They added that al-Hassan was captured and handed over to Iraqi authorities along with 29 other members of Saddam's collapsed Baath Party, whose Syrian branch has been in power in Damascus since 1963.

So this is a BIG haul. And if you're asking yourself "What's the big deal?" it's this:

The Iraqi officials did not specify when al-Hassan was captured, only saying he was detained following the Feb. 14 assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri in Beirut, Lebanon, in a blast that killed 16 others.

Syria has come under intense scrutiny following Hariri's death, with many in Lebanon blaming Damascus and Beirut's pro-Syrian government for the killing. The United States and France also have called on Damascus to withdraw 15,000 Syrian troops from Lebanon.

Washington has long accused Syria of harboring and aiding former members of Saddam's toppled Baathist regime suspected of involvement in the deadly insurgency against U.S.-led forces in Iraq.

"The capture appeared to be a goodwill gesture by the Syrians to show that they are cooperating," one Iraqi official told the AP.

Syria has been under the microscope since the Lebanon assassination. The U.S. called home its ambassador, angry Lebanese held demonstrations, and many European countries condemned Syria. This shows that all these pressure together led to some kind of action in Syria. Is it significant? Or too little too late? Time will tell.

Posted by Joe Gandelman | Permalink | Technorati Trackbacks
John Van Laer (mail):
Joe has it right. Only time will tell. In the meantime, my BS detector tells me that Saddam's half-brother is a trophy. That's all. A fancy prize of no real value. The real catch would have been Izzat Ibrahim al-Dhouri, the paymaster. Pardon my paranoia, but it would be typical of Baby Assad to round up a passel of minor figures so that he can go on protecting the real malefactor, al-Dhouri.

Notice that the Iraqi government press release is full of the usual guff about "We are tightening the noose around al-Zarqawi." Yeah. When have we heard that before? I'm praying that this last snarky bit will leave me with egg on my face. The sooner the better. Only time will tell.
2.27.2005 3:25pm
Ted Armstrong (mail):
I think the fact the Syrians handed him over is a good sign. It means the good eye-doctor would rather not fight the US. I would also contend that if the Syrians will make one concessions, even a non-consequential one, they'll make another. I interpret Syria's move as one of weakness.

It doesn’t mean the Syrians are going to surrender tomorrow, but it shows they’re worried – and that’s a good thing.
2.27.2005 4:14pm
Dave Schuler (mail) (www):
There's an old image of the family driving a troika throwing their infant to the pack of pursuing wolves to slow their advance.

Family in the troika = Syrians
Infant = al Hassan
Wolves = Americans
2.27.2005 4:25pm
Ted Armstrong (mail):
Except in this case, I think the wolves will chase even harder. They know the closer they get, the more the family may throw overboard.
2.27.2005 7:22pm
Dean Esmay (www):
I'm hoping the US pulls out all the stops here, but I don't know what all that would entail.

Clearly the three biggest problem regimes in the region are Iran, Syria, and Saudi Arabia. For a variety of reasons I've always felt that excessive truculence toward the Saudis is a bad idea--mostly because, fairly or not, it would send the message that we are against the entire Islamic world. Rightly or wrongly, the fact that the Saudis hold Mecca and Medina makes overt hostility toward them a very tricky business. So despite some on the right's impatience, I think we basically have the right attitude toward the Saudies right now. Pressuring them for reforms over time seems best.

Syria and Iran, however....
2.27.2005 8:05pm
Ted Armstrong (mail):
Thank goodness for North Korea. At least is in one member of the axis of evil that ISN'T arabl or isalmic.
2.27.2005 8:47pm
Dave Schuler (mail) (www):
I'm pulling for the wolves.
2.27.2005 10:59pm