Dean's World

Defending the liberal tradition in history, science, and philosophy.

"Incredible" Technological Breakthrough

A friend of mine sent me an interesting news story that appeared in a Canadian paper in January. It's about a guy who claims to have an amazing invention. He calls it the "Angel Light" and claims that it can see through practically any material, and also instantly disables practically any electronic device it's pointed toward, and also seems to kill fish. Supposedly the French and Saudi governments are interested in it. Click here to read the incredible story.

I use the word "incredible" advisedly: in my view, it usually means "not credible."

Note all the things wrong with it: this guy's not a professional engineer, just an inventor working in his garage. That doesn't prove anything, some technological innovations have indeed been created by such people: just look at the careers of Les Paul or Steve Wozniak for example. But rarely is it something more than a refinement of earlier technologies. More often such garage inventors are just cranks working on perpetual motion machines, force fields that don't work, flying cars that don't fly, and so on.

Second strike: read the entire story carefully. Go over it and tell me if I'm wrong about this, but, it appears that absolutely no one claims to have seen this doohickey work except the inventor. There are allusions to people at MIT but no names. One former MIT professor is quoted, and he says stuff like "there's a Nobel Prize" for Hurtubise if the Angel Light works, and "There are laws of physics waiting to be written for what he's talking about." Yeah no lie. If I claim I've built a teleportation machine in my basement, I'd expect my Nobel prize and some rewrites on elementary physics too. But I don't have any teleportation machine, do I?

(Well, not so far as any of you know... mwahahaha!)

Third strike: It all came to him in a dream. He has no blueprints.

Fourth strike: he shut it down because it's too dangerous. So dangerous he didn't even give a short demonstration to the photographer who took these photos?

Fifth strike: here's a story some amazing kevlar protective cushions that he's planning on outfitting the Canadian military with for free. It sounds amazing, but is it? Look at how they describe the tests: shooting directly at the cushions or attaching explosives directly onto the cushions. So basically he's got a dense kevlar shield that may absorb some blasts. Is there anything truly awe-inspiring here?

The one thing he's done that actually looks interesting is what he calls his "fire paste." That's been demonstrated to work for television cameras at Discovery. However, there are a lot of fireproof materials; the tiles on the space shuttle act much like that, and that's 30 year old technology. The only thing really interesting is that he claims he can make his stuff with common household chemicals, that it's extremely cheap, biodegradable, and non-toxic. If all that's the case, why hasn't he patented it and started selling it yet? He should make a fortune.

We of course cannot know that this guy's delusional. But someone needs to be asking him for rigorous proof, not camera stunts and allusions to nameless people he says he's talked to.

Posted by Dean | Permalink | Technorati Trackbacks
Michael Demmons (mail) (www):
Of course, I hope the guy is legit, but here's the quote that makes me skeptical:

"I turned it on—that was well over a year ago—and it worked and it was really awesome."

If it was true, then I would have expected the quote to be:

"I turned it on-that was well over a year ago-and it worked and I almost fainted and I started screaming because I've just proven every physist wrong and I'm going to be a multi-millionaire and my name will go down in history books. Oooo, is that girl undressing?"
2.10.2005 5:05am
Brian (formerly bb) (mail) (www):
I like his suit of armor in the back, on the right.
2.10.2005 8:49am
Farmer Joe (mail) (www):
Heh. I saw some science show a while back where some guy had claimed to levitate a bowling ball. What I learned from that show is that you should never trust any scientific claims that are prefaced by the words, "...from his makeshift laboratory in his Seattle apartment..."
2.10.2005 9:31am
Dean Esmay (www):
Yeah he claims that's his anti-bear suit.
2.10.2005 9:31am
Jay (mail):
Hey, now that you mention the anti-bear suit, I remember seeing this guy in a “documentary” on one of the science channels once a couple years back. The entire show was about him testing his bear suit.

He jumped off cliffs, got ran over by trucks, and suffered through all sorts of mayhem. But most of the film was basically him and his buddies sitting around smoking, drinking beer, and laughing. I never could quite figure out if the whole thing was a joke or not. Now it makes sense….
2.10.2005 2:41pm
Jay (mail):
Just found this link for Project Grizzly.

http://www.nfb.ca/grizzly/index.html

How did we ever live before the internet?
2.10.2005 2:48pm
Sandi (www):
@ Jay

Thats the same clip I saw on TV. The fact that he would let them swing that huge log at him, bear suit or no, proves to me that he is a brick or two short of enough to build a wall.

I googled a few sites that were discussing his "Angel Light":

Museum of Hoaxes
Capital of Nasty
ZPEnergy - (The Energy of The Future)

My opinion—he lô¿ôks to be a bit

2.10.2005 3:26pm
Steven Malcolm Anderson (www):
Sounds like a kook. I like kooks. I'm a kook myself. But I wouldn't by an unused car invented by one.
2.11.2005 12:05am