Zone Alarm: Blech
Dean
Richard Bennett (my favorite curmudgeon) has declared Zone Labs, publishers of Zone Alarm, Public Enemy Number One. For computer users, anyway.
I'm on his side.
Defending the liberal tradition in history, science, and philosophy.
Richard Bennett (my favorite curmudgeon) has declared Zone Labs, publishers of Zone Alarm, Public Enemy Number One. For computer users, anyway.
I'm on his side.
After uninstalling ZoneAlarm I had problems getting other firewalls to work, and also a few other software programs. It took a long exaustive registry search and destroy of all remenants of the Zone
CrapAlarm to get things back to normal.I used to hear nothing but good about ZoneAlarm.
It's amazing how concentrated the BS can be.
I'm currently running XP Pro w/SP2 installed. Am running ZA with no problems at all. I've been using Mozilla/Windows for nearly two years with no problems, and have encountered no problems while trying out Firefox as well.
I've also un-installed and re-installed ZA several times, and never had to muck around with the registry.
Sounds like someone is blaming their problems on someone else's software...
---
Addendum: for those who think that ZA is a "piece of crap," I have one name for you; Steve Gibson.
Thank you, and good night.
And I can confirm that the new version, which I just installed a couple days ago, will not install until all traces of the older version are removed by hand.
You're welcome to worship the ground that Steve Gibson walks on if you wish, but don't bullshit me.
I've always had good results with Zone Alarm. I run a home network with a hardware firewall (different routers with built in firewalls), but I always run ZoneAlarm as a backup on each individual PC (the Mac I only use the OS X firewall built in, no problems yet).
I have had no problems with Mozilla, Firefox, Thuderbird, Eudora, or IE in conjuction with ZoneAlarm.
I'm running Windows XP on various CPUs (Pentium III-M and two different Pentium 4s, one in a laptop and one in a desktop), and even with that variety of applications, plus an older Windows XP Pentium III desktop that was left behind in the US before I moved to France, I have yet to have any of the problems described, nor the problems I've had using other "internet protection solutions".
So, in the end, "your mileage may vary"????
If Mr. Bennett is having problems, it seems likely to me that it's due to some rare configuration issues or a bug that occurs in rare circumstances, rather than a general problem with ZoneAlarm. There are a lot of users of ZA, and I haven't heard of many issues with it. There are millions (at least) of different configurations of Windows hardware and software - testing every single one is beyond the capablity of *any* company (just ask Microsoft!).
Declaring ZoneLabs "public enemy number one" seems to me to be really over the top; after all, they offer a *free* version of the software. Really, this strikes me as just complaining about free ice cream.
I see I owe Richard a bit of an apology; I wasn't aware of the "older versions did work, but the latest doesn't" twist.
You see, I still use ZA Pro 3.0.082. It works quite well with my XP Pro w/SP2.
My apologies, Mr. Bennett. While I don't worship Steve Gibson {g}, I'll be happy to retract my statement that you are full of it. I was wrong.
I should be able to get this foot out of my mouth any minute now...
That said, has anyone determined whether any of this relates to SP2's improved firewall? I made sure that thing was off, but my ISP tech support remarked that sometimes even that won't do it, and some folks need to download some sort of patch from MS to really kill it, if desired.