The Osama Bin Laden Tape (Joe Gandelman)
Joe Gandelman
Will it help George Bush? Will it hurt George Bush? Was it a wash for the candidates?
Here's one opinion here -- plus a ton of other opinions for you to read, ponder, and comment on in the comment box. Make sure you keep scrolling down...









One of the most interesting things I saw presented in Gandalman's analysis of the effects of the tape was via his link to Walter Cronkite's appearance on Larry King Live.
Either Walter is far too senile now to be making public appearances, or he is far more leftist than we the viewing public ever perceived him to be back when he was CBS's anchor.
For a figure of Walter Cronkite's stature to intimate that a member of either political party would some how be involved with Osama bin Laden in a way such as to influence him to put out this tape at this time is positively astounding.
Of course, for an old leftist like Walter, nothing is beyond the scope of the "evil Karl Rove". Now it is quite clear how his progeny, Dan Rather, got to be the partisan hack that he has been revealed to be this election cycle.
Is it possible that CBS has been force-feeding us news all these many years with the same left-leaning bias that has been revealed lately thanks to cable news, and bloggers? Thank God we now have additional sources of information.
This myopia is causing them so self-destruct, and Cronkite's just another of the obvious symptoms rather than the disease itself.
Newspaper circulation continues to deteriorate nationwide. Network TV news, still a giant, is an aging, weaking giant. Competition is a healthy thing, but you'd think some of them would see the handwriting on the wall and start to realize they can't go on like this forever.
Osama bin Laden, ugliest shit in the world, even more so than Arafat, repeating all of Michael Moore's (Lord Pork Pork's) favorite "talking points", which are also the "talking points of John F. Kerry and his campaign, has made me very glad I voted for four more years of George W. Bush as Commander in Chief of our armed forces in this War.
As to Walter Cronkite, I'm very disappointed in him for saying that. It sounds like he's listening to Dan Rather too much, or maybe Michael Moore got to him. Too bad. I have always respected and liked Walter Cronkite since I was a little boy. He is still my favorite newsman of those I have ever seen on TV.
Two things about him that I have always remembered:
1) In 1968, our parents, who were Democrats, took my brother Dave and me to a political rally in Portland, Oregon. Walter Cronkite was covering the event. He had no idea who we were, us twin boys, but he saw us and he looked at us and smiled, beamed at us. His motive was pure benevolence for some total strangers' kids. Whatever his political views are today, he was a good man.
2) His enthusiasm for the space program during the 1960s was contagious. The climax of that was the climactic historic event of my life, the Apollo 11 Moon landing in 1969. His non-stop coverage of that epochal event and everything that led up to it was superlative. He was the Dean Esmay of his day.
In her book "Slander", about bias in the media, Ann Coulter attacked Walter Cronkite for attacking Jerry Falwell for blaming homosexuals, polytheists, atheists, etc., for the atrocity of totalitarian monotheists on 9/11/2001. My political views are, on the whole, closer to Coulter's than to Cronkite's these days. But I still think that, if I were a kid, I'd probably rather be smiled at by Walter Cronkite than scowled at and called a traitor by Ann Coulter.
I don't know...I might rather be scowled at and called a traitor by Ann Coulter than smiled at by Walter Cronkite...if they were both naked.
OK, shame on me, I shouldn't have said that ;-)