I'd venture to guess that using a digital camera within 100 yards of a polling place on election day will get one accused of intimidation rather than giving one the opportunity to document it.
I am still stunned at how this entire country has let itself go to electronic voting. It's not just the potential for fraud, but it's also the potential for false accusations of fraud. Mother of God, it's a disaster!
I've heard that some districts (California, if I recall) have actually regressed all the way back to putting an "X" in a box next to the candiate's name.
When I think about it, that sounds like a good idea; no "hanging chads," no electronic spoofing. It should be fairly clear whether there is an X in the box, or not. Very simple.
Mind you, it may take a bit longer to count, but that would give the MSM something to hyperventilate about.
Oh, and no more "late media winners' predictions skewed voting patterns" tomfoolery either.
I'm developing a voter fraud post because these people must be stopped!
That's what I'm dreading: all the horror stories coming out of districts which have been stampeded into using unreliable systems.
When I think about it, that sounds like a good idea; no "hanging chads," no electronic spoofing. It should be fairly clear whether there is an X in the box, or not. Very simple.
Mind you, it may take a bit longer to count, but that would give the MSM something to hyperventilate about.
Oh, and no more "late media winners' predictions skewed voting patterns" tomfoolery either.