Black Power
Dean
T-Steel is very annoyed with Democrats.
Baldilocks has a roundup of similar messages from other black bloggers.
Something I've said many times is that the American system has been set up from day one (for over 200 years I mean) in such a way that there can only be two parties. The third parties will always get their issues stolen by one of the two big parties. That's the way the system works, and unless you plan on rewriting the Constitution in very fundamental ways that's the way it will always work.
This is not as bad as some people make out though. The two parties wind up very big and having many interest groups within them.
But here is the danger: no matter what your interest is, or ethnicity, or whatever, you are always making a major miscalculation if you align yourself with only one party. Because then the fate of your issue rises and falls with the fate of that party. Black people need to start realizing this: Democrats do not respect them, and Republicans don't bother with them. And believe it or not, it is not because either party is racist. It's a simple matter of pragmatism: Democrats know they don't need to do anything but play the "rah rah" game to win black votes, and Republicans have learned through difficult experience that nothing they do will get black votes anyway.
As I've mentioned before, George W. Bush spent more time and more money campaigning in black communities and advertising on black radio than any Republican in history--and got compared to a lyncher and the lowest percentage of black voters in decades. You can say all you want about this, that or the other thing in the last few decades that seemed racist, the truth is you can find things just as bad done by Democrats. Fact is Republicans have learned through hard experience that no matter what they say, no matter how much money they spend, black people will not vote for them. So why try?
And why should Democrats ultimately really care what black voters want, so long as they know black people feel like they have nowhere else to go?
Gay voters need to learn the same lesson too. If Republicans know they can never get your vote, then quite seriously, why do they care what you think? I mean, other than to be nice? If you'll never support them, what motivation do they have to care what you think? About anything?
And you know, it really doesn't help much when the few blacks who do vote Republican get called Uncle Toms and Aunt Jemimahs and sellouts.
You know, when Condoleeza Rice's dad first tried to register to vote in Alabama, voter registration was done by the parties. The Democrats made black people guess the number of jellybeans in a jar and if they guessed wrong (almost always) they wouldn't register them. Republicans didn't play that game, which is why her father, and eventually her, became Republicans. So to sit around and say "well the Republicans did this, that, or the other thing that was racist in the past" is a fool's game, you can find bad stuff on both the parties. Hell, the Democrats were the party of the KKK for decades. But that's in the past, and involves people who (with a couple of exceptions) are all dead now.
I have long maintained that it is simply not healthy for anyone--not Republicans, not Democrats, not black people, not America as a whole--that one party owns the black vote and the other can't get black votes no matter what it does.
Because, again: neither Democrats nor Republicans have much reason to care what black people think. They know how you're going to vote anyway, so why should it matter to them?
* Update * I suppose this would be a good time to resurrect an old piece of mine: Rosa Parks Laments.









Candidate gets lots of exposure -- then folks run away in droves.
What's wrong with this picture?
Now, add up the fact that on at least half the issues, he was in tune with what polls said (and still say) black voters were in tune with: abortion, religion, school choice, etc. And still he was compared to a lyncher and did even less well than guys like Bob Dole and even worse than his father.
Problem with the candidate? Or problem with the community?
I don't expect a hard-core "Republicans are evil I never support them ever" Democrat to say anything but negatives, but there is, in my view, something systemically wrong when 9 out of 10 people vote a certain way and the worst they can say about a guy is "well we just don't like his smirk" or "he only signed one hate-crimes law and not two."
"Gay voters need to learn the same lesson too. If Republicans know they can never get your vote, then quite seriously, why do they care what you think? I mean, other than to be nice? If you'll never support them, what motivation do they have to care what you think? About anything?"
That's exactly right. And it works the other way, too. As long as Democratic politicians think that homosexuals will _always_ vote for them in preference to "those evil (gasp!) Republicans", they'll keep on tossing homosexuals and their rights in the dumpster whenever they think it's expedient. Homosexuals need to support _good_, old-fashioned, Goldwater-style Republicans like William Weld, Arnold Schwartzenegger, and Rudy Guliani. Even Bob Barr is opposing that FMA on the grounds that marriage must be left to the states.
Only a philosophy of limited government and individual rights is good for homosexuals, Negroes, Jews, or minorities of any kind.
There is BOTH a problem with the candidate AND the community. I'm amused that many white Republicans fail to own up to how some of their party's actions alienate black voters. Democrats flat out beat Republicans **on the ground**, putting themselves where black folks see them on a regular basis. The GOP is usually missing in action (and I blame black Republicans for it too). Democrats are skilled in placing ads in media **that black folks actually follow** whereas the GOP messes up big time here and then whines about why they aren't getting more black votes. Given that they rarely challenge what's said about them in media that black folks actually follow, no wonder.
I see Kerry operatives everywhere in black communities in my area. Where are Bush's folks? And in 2000, why did Bush allow that Gore-NAACP ad to lambaste him so with almost no response and allow his pre-ad 17% black support to dwindle down to 9%. He'd have won the popular vote outright as well but for that misstep. The blogger at Crispus (black libertarian website) even sent a "Republican Contract With Black America" to top GOP leaders, and never heard back from them. Such moves don't help the situation here.
If the Republican Party actually KNEW anything about black voters, then it would know that almost all of those aren't primary issues that black voters base their vote. Examine the political research. You'll see that black voters almost never base their vote on abortion, gay rights, etc. Or even religious beliefs. Until the GOP neutralizes the Dem advantage with black voters in that arena, forget about most blacks voting on social issues where the GOP could have an advantage.
To target black voters, one must first **know** black voters - an area where the GOP makes gaffe after gaffe. Personally, I believe both the Republican Party and Democratic Party have shady histories, and believe that most blacks should be independent voters. But that's another topic for another day.
Of course we all lose our tempers now and then. Dean freely admits to being imperfect in this regard, which is why regulars to this establishment will generally be cut more slack than people who we don't know very well.
Still: behave like an adult, or go find somewhere else to play. Thanks.