Dean's World
 Defending the liberal tradition in history, science, and philosophy.

.:: Dean's World: Self-Awareness ::.

November 18, 2003

Self-Awareness

It's a blessing and a curse, ain't it?

Posted by dean | PermaLink | TrackBack (0)

Discuss This Article!

 

Amen. Blissful, unwilling ignorance can sometimes be so much better.

Posted by OF Jay on November 18, 2003 at 1:12 PM


I'm sorry. In what way is it a blessing?

Who was the idiot who said that unexamined life is not worth living? If I could get my hands on him...

Which makes me wonder why I might have anger at self-knowledge. Hmm, something to contemplate about myself. Doh!

Posted by TheYeti on November 18, 2003 at 1:59 PM


I'm sorry. Were you talking to me?

Posted by Ara Rubyan on November 18, 2003 at 2:31 PM


Well, Dean, actually I'd say that self-awareness (or self-consciousness) is a function of the interplay, within the object-sign-interpretant triad, between self-representation (reflexive object-sign relationship) and self-interpretation (reflexive sign-interpretant relationship). But that's what I get for spending my time reading the philosophical writings of Charles Sanders Peirce.

Though probably I ought to say that self-awareness is an interpretive outgrowth of self-consciousness.

(And people out there are slapping their foreheads and saying to themselves, "Where the hell does that Burgess get this shit from, anyhow??!")

Posted by Paul Burgess on November 18, 2003 at 2:38 PM


As is self-pleasure for some.

Posted by Texas T-Bone on November 18, 2003 at 2:45 PM


Socrates? What'd he ever do to you?

Posted by dowingba on November 18, 2003 at 3:06 PM


I dunno, without self awareness would there be such a thing as masturbation?

Posted by Tiger on November 18, 2003 at 8:26 PM


Actually, Tiger, masturbation would be better without self-awareness. It would really be as if Rosey Palm (or her brother, Harry, as you prefer) was another person.

Posted by triticale on November 18, 2003 at 9:46 PM


But, without sentience there would be no 'you' to experience the moment.

On the other hand, getting swallowed alive wouldn't be as traumatic. (Past life experience.)

Posted by Alan Kellogg on November 19, 2003 at 3:20 AM


But, without sentience there would be no 'you' to experience the moment.

Which, in my opinion, merely removes the egotistical filters that separate us from the moment.

Instead of being "you", you would be the moment.

Posted by McGehee on November 19, 2003 at 9:37 PM


 



.:: ABOUT DEAN'S WORLD ::.


.:: BEST OF DEAN'S WORLD ::.


.:: RECENT ENTRIES ::.


.:: ARCHIVES ::.


.:: MISC ::.